![]() ![]() Also, I ended up "losing" tasks, and using the tool to look for them rather than being reminded of them this might be due to the learning curve, but it's not a good start. Slowness can be acceptable, but whenever I edited several tasks I ended up having 5 or 6 being updated at the same time, and then I got a generic error saying that the operation could not be completed: that's bad, because I don't want to have to remember and check everything I just did… This happened several times it might have been a transient problem (several days long), or an issue with my region, but that's a major problem for me. This said, I could have lived with this limitation the main issues I had with Toodledo are the unreliability of the web interface, and the clunky sync: I played with it for several days, and it has consistently been slow. There are various ways to work around this limitation, but that's just more friction, which is the worst problem in these tools. You have folders, you even have goals, but simply no projects. As an example, there is no concept of "Project". This platform is powerful, but it has a couple of strange limitations, and the worst web interface of them all… Toodledo is highly customizable, but some basic GTD concepts are difficult to implement. It is possible to forward emails to a specific Asana address, but that's cumbersome, and poses security issues: I can't simply forward emails, potentially including confidential attachments, to an external service (and I don't have the time to scrub the messages before sending them either). The real deal-breaker for me is the lack of an interface with Microsoft Outlook: at work I have to use Outlook, and there is no simple way to create a task from an email. It might simply be that I have not spent sufficient time with it. This said, I am still annoyed by the web interface I can't exactly explain why, I just can't get along with it. This platform has been greatly improved since last time I used it, especially the iOS app is great. Before getting into the details of Todoist, I'll quickly explain why I ruled out Asana and Toodledo. It does everything I need, it does not get in my way, and the adaptation time was short. The tool is not perfect, but what I particularly like is the low friction, at least in my workflow. To be fair I could not find the free trial option on the Todoist's website, but I received an invitation shortly after creating an account.Īs you can guess from the title of this post, my preference has fallen on Todoist. Two weeks are just right to get your hands dirty on a similar tool, and one month is perfect. Toodledo gives you two weeks, while Todoist gives you an entire month. I also found a couple of interesting new tools, based on Evernote, but I do not want to pollute my Evernote account with hundreds of to-do items.Īsana is free unless you have a big team, and both Toodledo and Todoist have a free version and offer you a trial for their respective premium versions (similarly priced). Mostly, I played with Asana, Toodledo, and Todoist. I decided to do this exercise with an open mind, and try tools which I previously discarded for lack of what I used to consider basic functionality (i.e. So, I decided to have a quick look at the evolution of the various platforms since last time I looked at them. I still miss OmniFocus sometimes (less and less to be honest), but I need more and more a Windows compatible tool, as at work I am stuck on a Windows machine. Agenda views are static, and it can be a lot of work to set up the perfect views for your workflow.Complexity of the configuration: elisp is a powerful language, Emacs allows you to customize absolutely everything, but when you start to use org on a bunch of machines, requiring different configurations, and you end up having to use git to synchronize them (see theses old posts to understand why I had to do that), it can become tricky to get the config right.No notifications: this is not a deal breaker for me, as I spend enough time in the tool, but time and location based notifications are handy.The iOS workflows that I posted in the previous posts rely on a working network connection, and I found them not completely reliable. On top of that, you need Emacs running somewhere for the sync to happen. Unfortunately at the moment I do not have the time to contribute to the project, and the tool is limited. Limited functionality of MobileOrg: this is by far the main reason why I started looking for alternatives.Still, I am moving away, at least for a while. Over the few months, I have been happy with org-mode, combining an incredible flexibility with the reliability of a plain text file in a Source Control System, and with the raw power of Emacs under the hood.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |